Binance to Delist Bytecoin, BCN Price Drops Over 15% ...

r/Cryptocurrency testing

For testing out CSS changes to CryptoCurrency.
[link]

Comparison between Avalanche, Cosmos and Polkadot

Comparison between Avalanche, Cosmos and Polkadot
Reposting after was mistakenly removed by mods (since resolved - Thanks)
A frequent question I see being asked is how Cosmos, Polkadot and Avalanche compare? Whilst there are similarities there are also a lot of differences. This article is not intended to be an extensive in-depth list, but rather an overview based on some of the criteria that I feel are most important.
For better formatting see https://medium.com/ava-hub/comparison-between-avalanche-cosmos-and-polkadot-a2a98f46c03b
https://preview.redd.it/e8s7dj3ivpq51.png?width=428&format=png&auto=webp&s=5d0463462702637118c7527ebf96e91f4a80b290

Overview

Cosmos

Cosmos is a heterogeneous network of many independent parallel blockchains, each powered by classical BFT consensus algorithms like Tendermint. Developers can easily build custom application specific blockchains, called Zones, through the Cosmos SDK framework. These Zones connect to Hubs, which are specifically designed to connect zones together.
The vision of Cosmos is to have thousands of Zones and Hubs that are Interoperable through the Inter-Blockchain Communication Protocol (IBC). Cosmos can also connect to other systems through peg zones, which are specifically designed zones that each are custom made to interact with another ecosystem such as Ethereum and Bitcoin. Cosmos does not use Sharding with each Zone and Hub being sovereign with their own validator set.
For a more in-depth look at Cosmos and provide more reference to points made in this article, please see my three part series — Part One, Part Two, Part Three
(There's a youtube video with a quick video overview of Cosmos on the medium article - https://medium.com/ava-hub/comparison-between-avalanche-cosmos-and-polkadot-a2a98f46c03b)

Polkadot

Polkadot is a heterogeneous blockchain protocol that connects multiple specialised blockchains into one unified network. It achieves scalability through a sharding infrastructure with multiple blockchains running in parallel, called parachains, that connect to a central chain called the Relay Chain. Developers can easily build custom application specific parachains through the Substrate development framework.
The relay chain validates the state transition of connected parachains, providing shared state across the entire ecosystem. If the Relay Chain must revert for any reason, then all of the parachains would also revert. This is to ensure that the validity of the entire system can persist, and no individual part is corruptible. The shared state makes it so that the trust assumptions when using parachains are only those of the Relay Chain validator set, and no other. Interoperability is enabled between parachains through Cross-Chain Message Passing (XCMP) protocol and is also possible to connect to other systems through bridges, which are specifically designed parachains or parathreads that each are custom made to interact with another ecosystem such as Ethereum and Bitcoin. The hope is to have 100 parachains connect to the relay chain.
For a more in-depth look at Polkadot and provide more reference to points made in this article, please see my three part series — Part One, Part Two, Part Three
(There's a youtube video with a quick video overview of Polkadot on the medium article - https://medium.com/ava-hub/comparison-between-avalanche-cosmos-and-polkadot-a2a98f46c03b)

Avalanche

Avalanche is a platform of platforms, ultimately consisting of thousands of subnets to form a heterogeneous interoperable network of many blockchains, that takes advantage of the revolutionary Avalanche Consensus protocols to provide a secure, globally distributed, interoperable and trustless framework offering unprecedented decentralisation whilst being able to comply with regulatory requirements.
Avalanche allows anyone to create their own tailor-made application specific blockchains, supporting multiple custom virtual machines such as EVM and WASM and written in popular languages like Go (with others coming in the future) rather than lightly used, poorly-understood languages like Solidity. This virtual machine can then be deployed on a custom blockchain network, called a subnet, which consist of a dynamic set of validators working together to achieve consensus on the state of a set of many blockchains where complex rulesets can be configured to meet regulatory compliance.
Avalanche was built with serving financial markets in mind. It has native support for easily creating and trading digital smart assets with complex custom rule sets that define how the asset is handled and traded to ensure regulatory compliance can be met. Interoperability is enabled between blockchains within a subnet as well as between subnets. Like Cosmos and Polkadot, Avalanche is also able to connect to other systems through bridges, through custom virtual machines made to interact with another ecosystem such as Ethereum and Bitcoin.
For a more in-depth look at Avalanche and provide more reference to points made in this article, please see here and here
(There's a youtube video with a quick video overview of Avalanche on the medium article - https://medium.com/ava-hub/comparison-between-avalanche-cosmos-and-polkadot-a2a98f46c03b)

Comparison between Cosmos, Polkadot and Avalanche

A frequent question I see being asked is how Cosmos, Polkadot and Avalanche compare? Whilst there are similarities there are also a lot of differences. This article is not intended to be an extensive in-depth list, but rather an overview based on some of the criteria that I feel are most important. For a more in-depth view I recommend reading the articles for each of the projects linked above and coming to your own conclusions. I want to stress that it’s not a case of one platform being the killer of all other platforms, far from it. There won’t be one platform to rule them all, and too often the tribalism has plagued this space. Blockchains are going to completely revolutionise most industries and have a profound effect on the world we know today. It’s still very early in this space with most adoption limited to speculation and trading mainly due to the limitations of Blockchain and current iteration of Ethereum, which all three of these platforms hope to address. For those who just want a quick summary see the image at the bottom of the article. With that said let’s have a look

Scalability

Cosmos

Each Zone and Hub in Cosmos is capable of up to around 1000 transactions per second with bandwidth being the bottleneck in consensus. Cosmos aims to have thousands of Zones and Hubs all connected through IBC. There is no limit on the number of Zones / Hubs that can be created

Polkadot

Parachains in Polkadot are also capable of up to around 1500 transactions per second. A portion of the parachain slots on the Relay Chain will be designated as part of the parathread pool, the performance of a parachain is split between many parathreads offering lower performance and compete amongst themselves in a per-block auction to have their transactions included in the next relay chain block. The number of parachains is limited by the number of validators on the relay chain, they hope to be able to achieve 100 parachains.

Avalanche

Avalanche is capable of around 4500 transactions per second per subnet, this is based on modest hardware requirements to ensure maximum decentralisation of just 2 CPU cores and 4 GB of Memory and with a validator size of over 2,000 nodes. Performance is CPU-bound and if higher performance is required then more specialised subnets can be created with higher minimum requirements to be able to achieve 10,000 tps+ in a subnet. Avalanche aims to have thousands of subnets (each with multiple virtual machines / blockchains) all interoperable with each other. There is no limit on the number of Subnets that can be created.

Results

All three platforms offer vastly superior performance to the likes of Bitcoin and Ethereum 1.0. Avalanche with its higher transactions per second, no limit on the number of subnets / blockchains that can be created and the consensus can scale to potentially millions of validators all participating in consensus scores ✅✅✅. Polkadot claims to offer more tps than cosmos, but is limited to the number of parachains (around 100) whereas with Cosmos there is no limit on the number of hubs / zones that can be created. Cosmos is limited to a fairly small validator size of around 200 before performance degrades whereas Polkadot hopes to be able to reach 1000 validators in the relay chain (albeit only a small number of validators are assigned to each parachain). Thus Cosmos and Polkadot scores ✅✅
https://preview.redd.it/2o0brllyvpq51.png?width=1000&format=png&auto=webp&s=8f62bb696ecaafcf6184da005d5fe0129d504518

Decentralisation

Cosmos

Tendermint consensus is limited to around 200 validators before performance starts to degrade. Whilst there is the Cosmos Hub it is one of many hubs in the network and there is no central hub or limit on the number of zones / hubs that can be created.

Polkadot

Polkadot has 1000 validators in the relay chain and these are split up into a small number that validate each parachain (minimum of 14). The relay chain is a central point of failure as all parachains connect to it and the number of parachains is limited depending on the number of validators (they hope to achieve 100 parachains). Due to the limited number of parachain slots available, significant sums of DOT will need to be purchased to win an auction to lease the slot for up to 24 months at a time. Thus likely to lead to only those with enough funds to secure a parachain slot. Parathreads are however an alternative for those that require less and more varied performance for those that can’t secure a parachain slot.

Avalanche

Avalanche consensus scan scale to tens of thousands of validators, even potentially millions of validators all participating in consensus through repeated sub-sampling. The more validators, the faster the network becomes as the load is split between them. There are modest hardware requirements so anyone can run a node and there is no limit on the number of subnets / virtual machines that can be created.

Results

Avalanche offers unparalleled decentralisation using its revolutionary consensus protocols that can scale to millions of validators all participating in consensus at the same time. There is no limit to the number of subnets and virtual machines that can be created, and they can be created by anyone for a small fee, it scores ✅✅✅. Cosmos is limited to 200 validators but no limit on the number of zones / hubs that can be created, which anyone can create and scores ✅✅. Polkadot hopes to accommodate 1000 validators in the relay chain (albeit these are split amongst each of the parachains). The number of parachains is limited and maybe cost prohibitive for many and the relay chain is a ultimately a single point of failure. Whilst definitely not saying it’s centralised and it is more decentralised than many others, just in comparison between the three, it scores ✅
https://preview.redd.it/ckfamee0wpq51.png?width=1000&format=png&auto=webp&s=c4355f145d821fabf7785e238dbc96a5f5ce2846

Latency

Cosmos

Tendermint consensus used in Cosmos reaches finality within 6 seconds. Cosmos consists of many Zones and Hubs that connect to each other. Communication between 2 zones could pass through many hubs along the way, thus also can contribute to latency times depending on the path taken as explained in part two of the articles on Cosmos. It doesn’t need to wait for an extended period of time with risk of rollbacks.

Polkadot

Polkadot provides a Hybrid consensus protocol consisting of Block producing protocol, BABE, and then a finality gadget called GRANDPA that works to agree on a chain, out of many possible forks, by following some simpler fork choice rule. Rather than voting on every block, instead it reaches agreements on chains. As soon as more than 2/3 of validators attest to a chain containing a certain block, all blocks leading up to that one are finalized at once.
If an invalid block is detected after it has been finalised then the relay chain would need to be reverted along with every parachain. This is particularly important when connecting to external blockchains as those don’t share the state of the relay chain and thus can’t be rolled back. The longer the time period, the more secure the network is, as there is more time for additional checks to be performed and reported but at the expense of finality. Finality is reached within 60 seconds between parachains but for external ecosystems like Ethereum their state obviously can’t be rolled back like a parachain and so finality will need to be much longer (60 minutes was suggested in the whitepaper) and discussed in more detail in part three

Avalanche

Avalanche consensus achieves finality within 3 seconds, with most happening sub 1 second, immutable and completely irreversible. Any subnet can connect directly to another without having to go through multiple hops and any VM can talk to another VM within the same subnet as well as external subnets. It doesn’t need to wait for an extended period of time with risk of rollbacks.

Results

With regards to performance far too much emphasis is just put on tps as a metric, the other equally important metric, if not more important with regards to finance is latency. Throughput measures the amount of data at any given time that it can handle whereas latency is the amount of time it takes to perform an action. It’s pointless saying you can process more transactions per second than VISA when it takes 60 seconds for a transaction to complete. Low latency also greatly increases general usability and customer satisfaction, nowadays everyone expects card payments, online payments to happen instantly. Avalanche achieves the best results scoring ✅✅✅, Cosmos with comes in second with 6 second finality ✅✅ and Polkadot with 60 second finality (which may be 60 minutes for external blockchains) scores ✅
https://preview.redd.it/kzup5x42wpq51.png?width=1000&format=png&auto=webp&s=320eb4c25dc4fc0f443a7a2f7ff09567871648cd

Shared Security

Cosmos

Every Zone and Hub in Cosmos has their own validator set and different trust assumptions. Cosmos are researching a shared security model where a Hub can validate the state of connected zones for a fee but not released yet. Once available this will make shared security optional rather than mandatory.

Polkadot

Shared Security is mandatory with Polkadot which uses a Shared State infrastructure between the Relay Chain and all of the connected parachains. If the Relay Chain must revert for any reason, then all of the parachains would also revert. Every parachain makes the same trust assumptions, and as such the relay chain validates state transition and enables seamless interoperability between them. In return for this benefit, they have to purchase DOT and win an auction for one of the available parachain slots.
However, parachains can’t just rely on the relay chain for their security, they will also need to implement censorship resistance measures and utilise proof of work / proof of stake for each parachain as well as discussed in part three, thus parachains can’t just rely on the security of the relay chain, they need to ensure sybil resistance mechanisms using POW and POS are implemented on the parachain as well.

Avalanche

A subnet in Avalanche consists of a dynamic set of validators working together to achieve consensus on the state of a set of many blockchains where complex rulesets can be configured to meet regulatory compliance. So unlike in Cosmos where each zone / hub has their own validators, A subnet can validate a single or many virtual machines / blockchains with a single validator set. Shared security is optional

Results

Shared security is mandatory in polkadot and a key design decision in its infrastructure. The relay chain validates the state transition of all connected parachains and thus scores ✅✅✅. Subnets in Avalanche can validate state of either a single or many virtual machines. Each subnet can have their own token and shares a validator set, where complex rulesets can be configured to meet regulatory compliance. It scores ✅ ✅. Every Zone and Hub in cosmos has their own validator set / token but research is underway to have the hub validate the state transition of connected zones, but as this is still early in the research phase scores ✅ for now.
https://preview.redd.it/pbgyk3o3wpq51.png?width=1000&format=png&auto=webp&s=61c18e12932a250f5633c40633810d0f64520575

Current Adoption

Cosmos

The Cosmos project started in 2016 with an ICO held in April 2017. There are currently around 50 projects building on the Cosmos SDK with a full list can be seen here and filtering for Cosmos SDK . Not all of the projects will necessarily connect using native cosmos sdk and IBC and some have forked parts of the Cosmos SDK and utilise the tendermint consensus such as Binance Chain but have said they will connect in the future.

Polkadot

The Polkadot project started in 2016 with an ICO held in October 2017. There are currently around 70 projects building on Substrate and a full list can be seen here and filtering for Substrate Based. Like with Cosmos not all projects built using substrate will necessarily connect to Polkadot and parachains or parathreads aren’t currently implemented in either the Live or Test network (Kusama) as of the time of this writing.

Avalanche

Avalanche in comparison started much later with Ava Labs being founded in 2018. Avalanche held it’s ICO in July 2020. Due to lot shorter time it has been in development, the number of projects confirmed are smaller with around 14 projects currently building on Avalanche. Due to the customisability of the platform though, many virtual machines can be used within a subnet making the process incredibly easy to port projects over. As an example, it will launch with the Ethereum Virtual Machine which enables byte for byte compatibility and all the tooling like Metamask, Truffle etc. will work, so projects can easily move over to benefit from the performance, decentralisation and low gas fees offered. In the future Cosmos and Substrate virtual machines could be implemented on Avalanche.

Results

Whilst it’s still early for all 3 projects (and the entire blockchain space as a whole), there is currently more projects confirmed to be building on Cosmos and Polkadot, mostly due to their longer time in development. Whilst Cosmos has fewer projects, zones are implemented compared to Polkadot which doesn’t currently have parachains. IBC to connect zones and hubs together is due to launch Q2 2021, thus both score ✅✅✅. Avalanche has been in development for a lot shorter time period, but is launching with an impressive feature set right from the start with ability to create subnets, VMs, assets, NFTs, permissioned and permissionless blockchains, cross chain atomic swaps within a subnet, smart contracts, bridge to Ethereum etc. Applications can easily port over from other platforms and use all the existing tooling such as Metamask / Truffle etc but benefit from the performance, decentralisation and low gas fees offered. Currently though just based on the number of projects in comparison it scores ✅.
https://preview.redd.it/4zpi6s85wpq51.png?width=1000&format=png&auto=webp&s=e91ade1a86a5d50f4976f3b23a46e9287b08e373

Enterprise Adoption

Cosmos

Cosmos enables permissioned and permissionless zones which can connect to each other with the ability to have full control over who validates the blockchain. For permissionless zones each zone / hub can have their own token and they are in control who validates.

Polkadot

With polkadot the state transition is performed by a small randomly selected assigned group of validators from the relay chain plus with the possibility that state is rolled back if an invalid transaction of any of the other parachains is found. This may pose a problem for enterprises that need complete control over who performs validation for regulatory reasons. In addition due to the limited number of parachain slots available Enterprises would have to acquire and lock up large amounts of a highly volatile asset (DOT) and have the possibility that they are outbid in future auctions and find they no longer can have their parachain validated and parathreads don’t provide the guaranteed performance requirements for the application to function.

Avalanche

Avalanche enables permissioned and permissionless subnets and complex rulesets can be configured to meet regulatory compliance. For example a subnet can be created where its mandatory that all validators are from a certain legal jurisdiction, or they hold a specific license and regulated by the SEC etc. Subnets are also able to scale to tens of thousands of validators, and even potentially millions of nodes, all participating in consensus so every enterprise can run their own node rather than only a small amount. Enterprises don’t have to hold large amounts of a highly volatile asset, but instead pay a fee in AVAX for the creation of the subnets and blockchains which is burnt.

Results

Avalanche provides the customisability to run private permissioned blockchains as well as permissionless where the enterprise is in control over who validates the blockchain, with the ability to use complex rulesets to meet regulatory compliance, thus scores ✅✅✅. Cosmos is also able to run permissioned and permissionless zones / hubs so enterprises have full control over who validates a blockchain and scores ✅✅. Polkadot requires locking up large amounts of a highly volatile asset with the possibility of being outbid by competitors and being unable to run the application if the guaranteed performance is required and having to migrate away. The relay chain validates the state transition and can roll back the parachain should an invalid block be detected on another parachain, thus scores ✅.
https://preview.redd.it/li5jy6u6wpq51.png?width=1000&format=png&auto=webp&s=e2a95f1f88e5efbcf9e23c789ae0f002c8eb73fc

Interoperability

Cosmos

Cosmos will connect Hubs and Zones together through its IBC protocol (due to release in Q1 2020). Connecting to blockchains outside of the Cosmos ecosystem would either require the connected blockchain to fork their code to implement IBC or more likely a custom “Peg Zone” will be created specific to work with a particular blockchain it’s trying to bridge to such as Ethereum etc. Each Zone and Hub has different trust levels and connectivity between 2 zones can have different trust depending on which path it takes (this is discussed more in this article). Finality time is low at 6 seconds, but depending on the number of hops, this can increase significantly.

Polkadot

Polkadot’s shared state means each parachain that connects shares the same trust assumptions, of the relay chain validators and that if one blockchain needs to be reverted, all of them will need to be reverted. Interoperability is enabled between parachains through Cross-Chain Message Passing (XCMP) protocol and is also possible to connect to other systems through bridges, which are specifically designed parachains or parathreads that each are custom made to interact with another ecosystem such as Ethereum and Bitcoin. Finality time between parachains is around 60 seconds, but longer will be needed (initial figures of 60 minutes in the whitepaper) for connecting to external blockchains. Thus limiting the appeal of connecting two external ecosystems together through Polkadot. Polkadot is also limited in the number of Parachain slots available, thus limiting the amount of blockchains that can be bridged. Parathreads could be used for lower performance bridges, but the speed of future blockchains is only going to increase.

Avalanche

A subnet can validate multiple virtual machines / blockchains and all blockchains within a subnet share the same trust assumptions / validator set, enabling cross chain interoperability. Interoperability is also possible between any other subnet, with the hope Avalanche will consist of thousands of subnets. Each subnet may have a different trust level, but as the primary network consists of all validators then this can be used as a source of trust if required. As Avalanche supports many virtual machines, bridges to other ecosystems are created by running the connected virtual machine. There will be an Ethereum bridge using the EVM shortly after mainnet. Finality time is much faster at sub 3 seconds (with most happening under 1 second) with no chance of rolling back so more appealing when connecting to external blockchains.

Results

All 3 systems are able to perform interoperability within their ecosystem and transfer assets as well as data, as well as use bridges to connect to external blockchains. Cosmos has different trust levels between its zones and hubs and can create issues depending on which path it takes and additional latency added. Polkadot provides the same trust assumptions for all connected parachains but has long finality and limited number of parachain slots available. Avalanche provides the same trust assumptions for all blockchains within a subnet, and different trust levels between subnets. However due to the primary network consisting of all validators it can be used for trust. Avalanche also has a much faster finality time with no limitation on the number of blockchains / subnets / bridges that can be created. Overall all three blockchains excel with interoperability within their ecosystem and each score ✅✅.
https://preview.redd.it/ai0bkbq8wpq51.png?width=1000&format=png&auto=webp&s=3e85ee6a3c4670f388ccea00b0c906c3fb51e415

Tokenomics

Cosmos

The ATOM token is the native token for the Cosmos Hub. It is commonly mistaken by people that think it’s the token used throughout the cosmos ecosystem, whereas it’s just used for one of many hubs in Cosmos, each with their own token. Currently ATOM has little utility as IBC isn’t released and has no connections to other zones / hubs. Once IBC is released zones may prefer to connect to a different hub instead and so ATOM is not used. ATOM isn’t a fixed capped supply token and supply will continuously increase with a yearly inflation of around 10% depending on the % staked. The current market cap for ATOM as of the time of this writing is $1 Billion with 203 million circulating supply. Rewards can be earnt through staking to offset the dilution caused by inflation. Delegators can also get slashed and lose a portion of their ATOM should the validator misbehave.

Polkadot

Polkadot’s native token is DOT and it’s used to secure the Relay Chain. Each parachain needs to acquire sufficient DOT to win an auction on an available parachain lease period of up to 24 months at a time. Parathreads have a fixed fee for registration that would realistically be much lower than the cost of acquiring a parachain slot and compete with other parathreads in a per-block auction to have their transactions included in the next relay chain block. DOT isn’t a fixed capped supply token and supply will continuously increase with a yearly inflation of around 10% depending on the % staked. The current market cap for DOT as of the time of this writing is $4.4 Billion with 852 million circulating supply. Delegators can also get slashed and lose their DOT (potentially 100% of their DOT for serious attacks) should the validator misbehave.

Avalanche

AVAX is the native token for the primary network in Avalanche. Every validator of any subnet also has to validate the primary network and stake a minimum of 2000 AVAX. There is no limit to the number of validators like other consensus methods then this can cater for tens of thousands even potentially millions of validators. As every validator validates the primary network, this can be a source of trust for interoperability between subnets as well as connecting to other ecosystems, thus increasing amount of transaction fees of AVAX. There is no slashing in Avalanche, so there is no risk to lose your AVAX when selecting a validator, instead rewards earnt for staking can be slashed should the validator misbehave. Because Avalanche doesn’t have direct slashing, it is technically possible for someone to both stake AND deliver tokens for something like a flash loan, under the invariant that all tokens that are staked are returned, thus being able to make profit with staked tokens outside of staking itself.
There will also be a separate subnet for Athereum which is a ‘spoon,’ or friendly fork, of Ethereum, which benefits from the Avalanche consensus protocol and applications in the Ethereum ecosystem. It’s native token ATH will be airdropped to ETH holders as well as potentially AVAX holders as well. This can be done for other blockchains as well.
Transaction fees on the primary network for all 3 of the blockchains as well as subscription fees for creating a subnet and blockchain are paid in AVAX and are burnt, creating deflationary pressure. AVAX is a fixed capped supply of 720 million tokens, creating scarcity rather than an unlimited supply which continuously increase of tokens at a compounded rate each year like others. Initially there will be 360 tokens minted at Mainnet with vesting periods between 1 and 10 years, with tokens gradually unlocking each quarter. The Circulating supply is 24.5 million AVAX with tokens gradually released each quater. The current market cap of AVAX is around $100 million.

Results

Avalanche’s AVAX with its fixed capped supply, deflationary pressure, very strong utility, potential to receive air drops and low market cap, means it scores ✅✅✅. Polkadot’s DOT also has very strong utility with the need for auctions to acquire parachain slots, but has no deflationary mechanisms, no fixed capped supply and already valued at $3.8 billion, therefore scores ✅✅. Cosmos’s ATOM token is only for the Cosmos Hub, of which there will be many hubs in the ecosystem and has very little utility currently. (this may improve once IBC is released and if Cosmos hub actually becomes the hub that people want to connect to and not something like Binance instead. There is no fixed capped supply and currently valued at $1.1 Billion, so scores ✅.
https://preview.redd.it/mels7myawpq51.png?width=1000&format=png&auto=webp&s=df9782e2c0a4c26b61e462746256bdf83b1fb906
All three are excellent projects and have similarities as well as many differences. Just to reiterate this article is not intended to be an extensive in-depth list, but rather an overview based on some of the criteria that I feel are most important. For a more in-depth view I recommend reading the articles for each of the projects linked above and coming to your own conclusions, you may have different criteria which is important to you, and score them differently. There won’t be one platform to rule them all however, with some uses cases better suited to one platform over another, and it’s not a zero-sum game. Blockchain is going to completely revolutionize industries and the Internet itself. The more projects researching and delivering breakthrough technology the better, each learning from each other and pushing each other to reach that goal earlier. The current market is a tiny speck of what’s in store in terms of value and adoption and it’s going to be exciting to watch it unfold.
https://preview.redd.it/dbb99egcwpq51.png?width=1388&format=png&auto=webp&s=aeb03127dc0dc74d0507328e899db1c7d7fc2879
For more information see the articles below (each with additional sources at the bottom of their articles)
Avalanche, a Revolutionary Consensus Engine and Platform. A Game Changer for Blockchain
Avalanche Consensus, The Biggest Breakthrough since Nakamoto
Cosmos — An Early In-Depth Analysis — Part One
Cosmos — An Early In-Depth Analysis — Part Two
Cosmos Hub ATOM Token and the commonly misunderstood staking tokens — Part Three
Polkadot — An Early In-Depth Analysis — Part One — Overview and Benefits
Polkadot — An Early In-Depth Analysis — Part Two — How Consensus Works
Polkadot — An Early In-Depth Analysis — Part Three — Limitations and Issues
submitted by xSeq22x to CryptoCurrency [link] [comments]

[ CryptoCurrency ] Comparison between Avalanche, Cosmos and Polkadot

[ 🔴 DELETED 🔴 ] Topic originally posted in CryptoCurrency by xSeq22x [link]
A frequent question I see being asked is how Cosmos, Polkadot and Avalanche compare? Whilst there are similarities there are also a lot of differences. This article is not intended to be an extensive in-depth list, but rather an overview based on some of the criteria that I feel are most important.
For better formatting see https://medium.com/ava-hub/comparison-between-avalanche-cosmos-and-polkadot-a2a98f46c03b
https://preview.redd.it/lg16iwk2dhq51.png?width=428&format=png&auto=webp&s=6c899ee69800dd6c5e2900d8fa83de7a43c57086

Overview

Cosmos

Cosmos is a heterogeneous network of many independent parallel blockchains, each powered by classical BFT consensus algorithms like Tendermint. Developers can easily build custom application specific blockchains, called Zones, through the Cosmos SDK framework. These Zones connect to Hubs, which are specifically designed to connect zones together.
The vision of Cosmos is to have thousands of Zones and Hubs that are Interoperable through the Inter-Blockchain Communication Protocol (IBC). Cosmos can also connect to other systems through peg zones, which are specifically designed zones that each are custom made to interact with another ecosystem such as Ethereum and Bitcoin. Cosmos does not use Sharding with each Zone and Hub being sovereign with their own validator set.
For a more in-depth look at Cosmos and provide more reference to points made in this article, please see my three part series — Part One, Part Two, Part Three
https://youtu.be/Eb8xkDi_PUg

Polkadot

Polkadot is a heterogeneous blockchain protocol that connects multiple specialised blockchains into one unified network. It achieves scalability through a sharding infrastructure with multiple blockchains running in parallel, called parachains, that connect to a central chain called the Relay Chain. Developers can easily build custom application specific parachains through the Substrate development framework.
The relay chain validates the state transition of connected parachains, providing shared state across the entire ecosystem. If the Relay Chain must revert for any reason, then all of the parachains would also revert. This is to ensure that the validity of the entire system can persist, and no individual part is corruptible. The shared state makes it so that the trust assumptions when using parachains are only those of the Relay Chain validator set, and no other. Interoperability is enabled between parachains through Cross-Chain Message Passing (XCMP) protocol and is also possible to connect to other systems through bridges, which are specifically designed parachains or parathreads that each are custom made to interact with another ecosystem such as Ethereum and Bitcoin. The hope is to have 100 parachains connect to the relay chain.
For a more in-depth look at Polkadot and provide more reference to points made in this article, please see my three part series — Part One, Part Two, Part Three
https://youtu.be/_-k0xkooSlA

Avalanche

Avalanche is a platform of platforms, ultimately consisting of thousands of subnets to form a heterogeneous interoperable network of many blockchains, that takes advantage of the revolutionary Avalanche Consensus protocols to provide a secure, globally distributed, interoperable and trustless framework offering unprecedented decentralisation whilst being able to comply with regulatory requirements.
Avalanche allows anyone to create their own tailor-made application specific blockchains, supporting multiple custom virtual machines such as EVM and WASM and written in popular languages like Go (with others coming in the future) rather than lightly used, poorly-understood languages like Solidity. This virtual machine can then be deployed on a custom blockchain network, called a subnet, which consist of a dynamic set of validators working together to achieve consensus on the state of a set of many blockchains where complex rulesets can be configured to meet regulatory compliance.
Avalanche was built with serving financial markets in mind. It has native support for easily creating and trading digital smart assets with complex custom rule sets that define how the asset is handled and traded to ensure regulatory compliance can be met. Interoperability is enabled between blockchains within a subnet as well as between subnets. Like Cosmos and Polkadot, Avalanche is also able to connect to other systems through bridges, through custom virtual machines made to interact with another ecosystem such as Ethereum and Bitcoin.
For a more in-depth look at Avalanche and provide more reference to points made in this article, please see here and here
https://youtu.be/mWBzFmzzBAg

Comparison between Cosmos, Polkadot and Avalanche

A frequent question I see being asked is how Cosmos, Polkadot and Avalanche compare? Whilst there are similarities there are also a lot of differences. This article is not intended to be an extensive in-depth list, but rather an overview based on some of the criteria that I feel are most important. For a more in-depth view I recommend reading the articles for each of the projects linked above and coming to your own conclusions. I want to stress that it’s not a case of one platform being the killer of all other platforms, far from it. There won’t be one platform to rule them all, and too often the tribalism has plagued this space. Blockchains are going to completely revolutionise most industries and have a profound effect on the world we know today. It’s still very early in this space with most adoption limited to speculation and trading mainly due to the limitations of Blockchain and current iteration of Ethereum, which all three of these platforms hope to address. For those who just want a quick summary see the image at the bottom of the article. With that said let’s have a look

Scalability

Cosmos

Each Zone and Hub in Cosmos is capable of up to around 1000 transactions per second with bandwidth being the bottleneck in consensus. Cosmos aims to have thousands of Zones and Hubs all connected through IBC. There is no limit on the number of Zones / Hubs that can be created

Polkadot

Parachains in Polkadot are also capable of up to around 1500 transactions per second. A portion of the parachain slots on the Relay Chain will be designated as part of the parathread pool, the performance of a parachain is split between many parathreads offering lower performance and compete amongst themselves in a per-block auction to have their transactions included in the next relay chain block. The number of parachains is limited by the number of validators on the relay chain, they hope to be able to achieve 100 parachains.

Avalanche

Avalanche is capable of around 4500 transactions per second per subnet, this is based on modest hardware requirements to ensure maximum decentralisation of just 2 CPU cores and 4 GB of Memory and with a validator size of over 2,000 nodes. Performance is CPU-bound and if higher performance is required then more specialised subnets can be created with higher minimum requirements to be able to achieve 10,000 tps+ in a subnet. Avalanche aims to have thousands of subnets (each with multiple virtual machines / blockchains) all interoperable with each other. There is no limit on the number of Subnets that can be created.

Results

All three platforms offer vastly superior performance to the likes of Bitcoin and Ethereum 1.0. Avalanche with its higher transactions per second, no limit on the number of subnets / blockchains that can be created and the consensus can scale to potentially millions of validators all participating in consensus scores ✅✅✅. Polkadot claims to offer more tps than cosmos, but is limited to the number of parachains (around 100) whereas with Cosmos there is no limit on the number of hubs / zones that can be created. Cosmos is limited to a fairly small validator size of around 200 before performance degrades whereas Polkadot hopes to be able to reach 1000 validators in the relay chain (albeit only a small number of validators are assigned to each parachain). Thus Cosmos and Polkadot scores ✅✅
https://preview.redd.it/ththwq5qdhq51.png?width=1000&format=png&auto=webp&s=92f75152c90d984911db88ed174ebf3a147ca70d

Decentralisation

Cosmos

Tendermint consensus is limited to around 200 validators before performance starts to degrade. Whilst there is the Cosmos Hub it is one of many hubs in the network and there is no central hub or limit on the number of zones / hubs that can be created.

Polkadot

Polkadot has 1000 validators in the relay chain and these are split up into a small number that validate each parachain (minimum of 14). The relay chain is a central point of failure as all parachains connect to it and the number of parachains is limited depending on the number of validators (they hope to achieve 100 parachains). Due to the limited number of parachain slots available, significant sums of DOT will need to be purchased to win an auction to lease the slot for up to 24 months at a time. Thus likely to lead to only those with enough funds to secure a parachain slot. Parathreads are however an alternative for those that require less and more varied performance for those that can’t secure a parachain slot.

Avalanche

Avalanche consensus scan scale to tens of thousands of validators, even potentially millions of validators all participating in consensus through repeated sub-sampling. The more validators, the faster the network becomes as the load is split between them. There are modest hardware requirements so anyone can run a node and there is no limit on the number of subnets / virtual machines that can be created.

Results

Avalanche offers unparalleled decentralisation using its revolutionary consensus protocols that can scale to millions of validators all participating in consensus at the same time. There is no limit to the number of subnets and virtual machines that can be created, and they can be created by anyone for a small fee, it scores ✅✅✅. Cosmos is limited to 200 validators but no limit on the number of zones / hubs that can be created, which anyone can create and scores ✅✅. Polkadot hopes to accommodate 1000 validators in the relay chain (albeit these are split amongst each of the parachains). The number of parachains is limited and maybe cost prohibitive for many and the relay chain is a ultimately a single point of failure. Whilst definitely not saying it’s centralised and it is more decentralised than many others, just in comparison between the three, it scores ✅
https://preview.redd.it/lv2h7g9sdhq51.png?width=1000&format=png&auto=webp&s=56eada6e8c72dbb4406d7c5377ad15608bcc730e

Latency

Cosmos

Tendermint consensus used in Cosmos reaches finality within 6 seconds. Cosmos consists of many Zones and Hubs that connect to each other. Communication between 2 zones could pass through many hubs along the way, thus also can contribute to latency times depending on the path taken as explained in part two of the articles on Cosmos. It doesn’t need to wait for an extended period of time with risk of rollbacks.

Polkadot

Polkadot provides a Hybrid consensus protocol consisting of Block producing protocol, BABE, and then a finality gadget called GRANDPA that works to agree on a chain, out of many possible forks, by following some simpler fork choice rule. Rather than voting on every block, instead it reaches agreements on chains. As soon as more than 2/3 of validators attest to a chain containing a certain block, all blocks leading up to that one are finalized at once.
If an invalid block is detected after it has been finalised then the relay chain would need to be reverted along with every parachain. This is particularly important when connecting to external blockchains as those don’t share the state of the relay chain and thus can’t be rolled back. The longer the time period, the more secure the network is, as there is more time for additional checks to be performed and reported but at the expense of finality. Finality is reached within 60 seconds between parachains but for external ecosystems like Ethereum their state obviously can’t be rolled back like a parachain and so finality will need to be much longer (60 minutes was suggested in the whitepaper) and discussed in more detail in part three

Avalanche

Avalanche consensus achieves finality within 3 seconds, with most happening sub 1 second, immutable and completely irreversible. Any subnet can connect directly to another without having to go through multiple hops and any VM can talk to another VM within the same subnet as well as external subnets. It doesn’t need to wait for an extended period of time with risk of rollbacks.

Results

With regards to performance far too much emphasis is just put on tps as a metric, the other equally important metric, if not more important with regards to finance is latency. Throughput measures the amount of data at any given time that it can handle whereas latency is the amount of time it takes to perform an action. It’s pointless saying you can process more transactions per second than VISA when it takes 60 seconds for a transaction to complete. Low latency also greatly increases general usability and customer satisfaction, nowadays everyone expects card payments, online payments to happen instantly. Avalanche achieves the best results scoring ✅✅✅, Cosmos with comes in second with 6 second finality ✅✅ and Polkadot with 60 second finality (which may be 60 minutes for external blockchains) scores ✅
https://preview.redd.it/qe8e5ltudhq51.png?width=1000&format=png&auto=webp&s=18a2866104590f81a818690337f9121161dda890

Shared Security

Cosmos

Every Zone and Hub in Cosmos has their own validator set and different trust assumptions. Cosmos are researching a shared security model where a Hub can validate the state of connected zones for a fee but not released yet. Once available this will make shared security optional rather than mandatory.

Polkadot

Shared Security is mandatory with Polkadot which uses a Shared State infrastructure between the Relay Chain and all of the connected parachains. If the Relay Chain must revert for any reason, then all of the parachains would also revert. Every parachain makes the same trust assumptions, and as such the relay chain validates state transition and enables seamless interoperability between them. In return for this benefit, they have to purchase DOT and win an auction for one of the available parachain slots.
However, parachains can’t just rely on the relay chain for their security, they will also need to implement censorship resistance measures and utilise proof of work / proof of stake for each parachain as well as discussed in part three, thus parachains can’t just rely on the security of the relay chain, they need to ensure sybil resistance mechanisms using POW and POS are implemented on the parachain as well.

Avalanche

A subnet in Avalanche consists of a dynamic set of validators working together to achieve consensus on the state of a set of many blockchains where complex rulesets can be configured to meet regulatory compliance. So unlike in Cosmos where each zone / hub has their own validators, A subnet can validate a single or many virtual machines / blockchains with a single validator set. Shared security is optional

Results

Shared security is mandatory in polkadot and a key design decision in its infrastructure. The relay chain validates the state transition of all connected parachains and thus scores ✅✅✅. Subnets in Avalanche can validate state of either a single or many virtual machines. Each subnet can have their own token and shares a validator set, where complex rulesets can be configured to meet regulatory compliance. It scores ✅ ✅. Every Zone and Hub in cosmos has their own validator set / token but research is underway to have the hub validate the state transition of connected zones, but as this is still early in the research phase scores ✅ for now.
https://preview.redd.it/0mnvpnzwdhq51.png?width=1000&format=png&auto=webp&s=8927ff2821415817265be75c59261f83851a2791

Current Adoption

Cosmos

The Cosmos project started in 2016 with an ICO held in April 2017. There are currently around 50 projects building on the Cosmos SDK with a full list can be seen here and filtering for Cosmos SDK . Not all of the projects will necessarily connect using native cosmos sdk and IBC and some have forked parts of the Cosmos SDK and utilise the tendermint consensus such as Binance Chain but have said they will connect in the future.

Polkadot

The Polkadot project started in 2016 with an ICO held in October 2017. There are currently around 70 projects building on Substrate and a full list can be seen here and filtering for Substrate Based. Like with Cosmos not all projects built using substrate will necessarily connect to Polkadot and parachains or parathreads aren’t currently implemented in either the Live or Test network (Kusama) as of the time of this writing.

Avalanche

Avalanche in comparison started much later with Ava Labs being founded in 2018. Avalanche held it’s ICO in July 2020. Due to lot shorter time it has been in development, the number of projects confirmed are smaller with around 14 projects currently building on Avalanche. Due to the customisability of the platform though, many virtual machines can be used within a subnet making the process incredibly easy to port projects over. As an example, it will launch with the Ethereum Virtual Machine which enables byte for byte compatibility and all the tooling like Metamask, Truffle etc. will work, so projects can easily move over to benefit from the performance, decentralisation and low gas fees offered. In the future Cosmos and Substrate virtual machines could be implemented on Avalanche.

Results

Whilst it’s still early for all 3 projects (and the entire blockchain space as a whole), there is currently more projects confirmed to be building on Cosmos and Polkadot, mostly due to their longer time in development. Whilst Cosmos has fewer projects, zones are implemented compared to Polkadot which doesn’t currently have parachains. IBC to connect zones and hubs together is due to launch Q2 2021, thus both score ✅✅✅. Avalanche has been in development for a lot shorter time period, but is launching with an impressive feature set right from the start with ability to create subnets, VMs, assets, NFTs, permissioned and permissionless blockchains, cross chain atomic swaps within a subnet, smart contracts, bridge to Ethereum etc. Applications can easily port over from other platforms and use all the existing tooling such as Metamask / Truffle etc but benefit from the performance, decentralisation and low gas fees offered. Currently though just based on the number of projects in comparison it scores ✅.
https://preview.redd.it/rsctxi6zdhq51.png?width=1000&format=png&auto=webp&s=ff762dea3cfc2aaaa3c8fc7b1070d5be6759aac2

Enterprise Adoption

Cosmos

Cosmos enables permissioned and permissionless zones which can connect to each other with the ability to have full control over who validates the blockchain. For permissionless zones each zone / hub can have their own token and they are in control who validates.

Polkadot

With polkadot the state transition is performed by a small randomly selected assigned group of validators from the relay chain plus with the possibility that state is rolled back if an invalid transaction of any of the other parachains is found. This may pose a problem for enterprises that need complete control over who performs validation for regulatory reasons. In addition due to the limited number of parachain slots available Enterprises would have to acquire and lock up large amounts of a highly volatile asset (DOT) and have the possibility that they are outbid in future auctions and find they no longer can have their parachain validated and parathreads don’t provide the guaranteed performance requirements for the application to function.

Avalanche

Avalanche enables permissioned and permissionless subnets and complex rulesets can be configured to meet regulatory compliance. For example a subnet can be created where its mandatory that all validators are from a certain legal jurisdiction, or they hold a specific license and regulated by the SEC etc. Subnets are also able to scale to tens of thousands of validators, and even potentially millions of nodes, all participating in consensus so every enterprise can run their own node rather than only a small amount. Enterprises don’t have to hold large amounts of a highly volatile asset, but instead pay a fee in AVAX for the creation of the subnets and blockchains which is burnt.

Results

Avalanche provides the customisability to run private permissioned blockchains as well as permissionless where the enterprise is in control over who validates the blockchain, with the ability to use complex rulesets to meet regulatory compliance, thus scores ✅✅✅. Cosmos is also able to run permissioned and permissionless zones / hubs so enterprises have full control over who validates a blockchain and scores ✅✅. Polkadot requires locking up large amounts of a highly volatile asset with the possibility of being outbid by competitors and being unable to run the application if the guaranteed performance is required and having to migrate away. The relay chain validates the state transition and can roll back the parachain should an invalid block be detected on another parachain, thus scores ✅.
https://preview.redd.it/7phaylb1ehq51.png?width=1000&format=png&auto=webp&s=d86d2ec49de456403edbaf27009ed0e25609fbff

Interoperability

Cosmos

Cosmos will connect Hubs and Zones together through its IBC protocol (due to release in Q1 2020). Connecting to blockchains outside of the Cosmos ecosystem would either require the connected blockchain to fork their code to implement IBC or more likely a custom “Peg Zone” will be created specific to work with a particular blockchain it’s trying to bridge to such as Ethereum etc. Each Zone and Hub has different trust levels and connectivity between 2 zones can have different trust depending on which path it takes (this is discussed more in this article). Finality time is low at 6 seconds, but depending on the number of hops, this can increase significantly.

Polkadot

Polkadot’s shared state means each parachain that connects shares the same trust assumptions, of the relay chain validators and that if one blockchain needs to be reverted, all of them will need to be reverted. Interoperability is enabled between parachains through Cross-Chain Message Passing (XCMP) protocol and is also possible to connect to other systems through bridges, which are specifically designed parachains or parathreads that each are custom made to interact with another ecosystem such as Ethereum and Bitcoin. Finality time between parachains is around 60 seconds, but longer will be needed (initial figures of 60 minutes in the whitepaper) for connecting to external blockchains. Thus limiting the appeal of connecting two external ecosystems together through Polkadot. Polkadot is also limited in the number of Parachain slots available, thus limiting the amount of blockchains that can be bridged. Parathreads could be used for lower performance bridges, but the speed of future blockchains is only going to increase.

Avalanche

A subnet can validate multiple virtual machines / blockchains and all blockchains within a subnet share the same trust assumptions / validator set, enabling cross chain interoperability. Interoperability is also possible between any other subnet, with the hope Avalanche will consist of thousands of subnets. Each subnet may have a different trust level, but as the primary network consists of all validators then this can be used as a source of trust if required. As Avalanche supports many virtual machines, bridges to other ecosystems are created by running the connected virtual machine. There will be an Ethereum bridge using the EVM shortly after mainnet. Finality time is much faster at sub 3 seconds (with most happening under 1 second) with no chance of rolling back so more appealing when connecting to external blockchains.

Results

All 3 systems are able to perform interoperability within their ecosystem and transfer assets as well as data, as well as use bridges to connect to external blockchains. Cosmos has different trust levels between its zones and hubs and can create issues depending on which path it takes and additional latency added. Polkadot provides the same trust assumptions for all connected parachains but has long finality and limited number of parachain slots available. Avalanche provides the same trust assumptions for all blockchains within a subnet, and different trust levels between subnets. However due to the primary network consisting of all validators it can be used for trust. Avalanche also has a much faster finality time with no limitation on the number of blockchains / subnets / bridges that can be created. Overall all three blockchains excel with interoperability within their ecosystem and each score ✅✅.
https://preview.redd.it/l775gue3ehq51.png?width=1000&format=png&auto=webp&s=b7c4b5802ceb1a9307bd2a8d65f393d1bcb0d7c6

Tokenomics

Cosmos

The ATOM token is the native token for the Cosmos Hub. It is commonly mistaken by people that think it’s the token used throughout the cosmos ecosystem, whereas it’s just used for one of many hubs in Cosmos, each with their own token. Currently ATOM has little utility as IBC isn’t released and has no connections to other zones / hubs. Once IBC is released zones may prefer to connect to a different hub instead and so ATOM is not used. ATOM isn’t a fixed capped supply token and supply will continuously increase with a yearly inflation of around 10% depending on the % staked. The current market cap for ATOM as of the time of this writing is $1 Billion with 203 million circulating supply. Rewards can be earnt through staking to offset the dilution caused by inflation. Delegators can also get slashed and lose a portion of their ATOM should the validator misbehave.

Polkadot

Polkadot’s native token is DOT and it’s used to secure the Relay Chain. Each parachain needs to acquire sufficient DOT to win an auction on an available parachain lease period of up to 24 months at a time. Parathreads have a fixed fee for registration that would realistically be much lower than the cost of acquiring a parachain slot and compete with other parathreads in a per-block auction to have their transactions included in the next relay chain block. DOT isn’t a fixed capped supply token and supply will continuously increase with a yearly inflation of around 10% depending on the % staked. The current market cap for DOT as of the time of this writing is $4.4 Billion with 852 million circulating supply. Delegators can also get slashed and lose their DOT (potentially 100% of their DOT for serious attacks) should the validator misbehave.

Avalanche

AVAX is the native token for the primary network in Avalanche. Every validator of any subnet also has to validate the primary network and stake a minimum of 2000 AVAX. There is no limit to the number of validators like other consensus methods then this can cater for tens of thousands even potentially millions of validators. As every validator validates the primary network, this can be a source of trust for interoperability between subnets as well as connecting to other ecosystems, thus increasing amount of transaction fees of AVAX. There is no slashing in Avalanche, so there is no risk to lose your AVAX when selecting a validator, instead rewards earnt for staking can be slashed should the validator misbehave. Because Avalanche doesn’t have direct slashing, it is technically possible for someone to both stake AND deliver tokens for something like a flash loan, under the invariant that all tokens that are staked are returned, thus being able to make profit with staked tokens outside of staking itself.
There will also be a separate subnet for Athereum which is a ‘spoon,’ or friendly fork, of Ethereum, which benefits from the Avalanche consensus protocol and applications in the Ethereum ecosystem. It’s native token ATH will be airdropped to ETH holders as well as potentially AVAX holders as well. This can be done for other blockchains as well.
Transaction fees on the primary network for all 3 of the blockchains as well as subscription fees for creating a subnet and blockchain are paid in AVAX and are burnt, creating deflationary pressure. AVAX is a fixed capped supply of 720 million tokens, creating scarcity rather than an unlimited supply which continuously increase of tokens at a compounded rate each year like others. Initially there will be 360 tokens minted at Mainnet with vesting periods between 1 and 10 years, with tokens gradually unlocking each quarter. The Circulating supply is 24.5 million AVAX with tokens gradually released each quater. The current market cap of AVAX is around $100 million.

Results

Avalanche’s AVAX with its fixed capped supply, deflationary pressure, very strong utility, potential to receive air drops and low market cap, means it scores ✅✅✅. Polkadot’s DOT also has very strong utility with the need for auctions to acquire parachain slots, but has no deflationary mechanisms, no fixed capped supply and already valued at $3.8 billion, therefore scores ✅✅. Cosmos’s ATOM token is only for the Cosmos Hub, of which there will be many hubs in the ecosystem and has very little utility currently. (this may improve once IBC is released and if Cosmos hub actually becomes the hub that people want to connect to and not something like Binance instead. There is no fixed capped supply and currently valued at $1.1 Billion, so scores ✅.
https://preview.redd.it/zb72eto5ehq51.png?width=1000&format=png&auto=webp&s=0ee102a2881d763296ad9ffba20667f531d2fd7a
All three are excellent projects and have similarities as well as many differences. Just to reiterate this article is not intended to be an extensive in-depth list, but rather an overview based on some of the criteria that I feel are most important. For a more in-depth view I recommend reading the articles for each of the projects linked above and coming to your own conclusions, you may have different criteria which is important to you, and score them differently. There won’t be one platform to rule them all however, with some uses cases better suited to one platform over another, and it’s not a zero-sum game. Blockchain is going to completely revolutionize industries and the Internet itself. The more projects researching and delivering breakthrough technology the better, each learning from each other and pushing each other to reach that goal earlier. The current market is a tiny speck of what’s in store in terms of value and adoption and it’s going to be exciting to watch it unfold.
https://preview.redd.it/fwi3clz7ehq51.png?width=1388&format=png&auto=webp&s=c91c1645a4c67defd5fc3aaec84f4a765e1c50b6
xSeq22x your post has been copied because one or more comments in this topic have been removed. This copy will preserve unmoderated topic. If you would like to opt-out, please send a message using [this link].
submitted by anticensor_bot to u/anticensor_bot [link] [comments]

Celebrate Halloween sale with special discounts!

Celebrate Halloween sale with special discounts!
Get 15% off your SecuX STONE V20 and W20 with eCoupon code: Halloween2020 *The discount code expires Nov 1
The most secure SecuX STONE crypto hardware wallets elevate security and private key protection for digital asserts with CC EAL 5+ certified secure element and MCU burn-in security. Go to Shop : https://shop.secuxtech.com/

https://preview.redd.it/56z4jnhaykv51.jpg?width=500&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=d334b2be6b308b72a07951c4fdf48190c41d5f2b
#SecuX #hardwarewallet #bitcoinwallet #blockchain #crypto #halloween #trickandtreat #COVID #staysafe #Bitcoin #BitcoinCash #Ethereum #Litecoin #Ripple #BinanceCoin #Stellar #Dash #Doge #DigiByte #Groestlecoin #ERC20
submitted by SecuXvault to u/SecuXvault [link] [comments]

Celebrate Halloween sale with special discounts!

Celebrate Halloween sale with special discounts!
Get 15% off your SecuX STONE V20 and W20 with eCoupon code: Halloween2020 *The discount code expires Nov 1
The most secure SecuX STONE crypto hardware wallets elevate security and private key protection for digital asserts with CC EAL 5+ certified secure element and MCU burn-in security. Go to Shop : https://shop.secuxtech.com/

https://preview.redd.it/yb7lkso2zkv51.jpg?width=500&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=74821e2afc4a66a85a6a3eabf693e98b4bc2e0c7
#SecuX #hardwarewallet #bitcoinwallet #blockchain #crypto #halloween #trickandtreat #COVID #staysafe #Bitcoin #BitcoinCash #Ethereum #Litecoin #Ripple #BinanceCoin #Stellar #Dash #Doge #DigiByte #Groestlecoin #ERC20
submitted by SecuXwallet to u/SecuXwallet [link] [comments]

Syscoin Platform’s Great Reddit Scaling Bake-off Proposal

Syscoin Platform’s Great Reddit Scaling Bake-off Proposal

https://preview.redd.it/rqt2dldyg8e51.jpg?width=1044&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=777ae9d4fbbb54c3540682b72700fc4ba3de0a44
We are excited to participate and present Syscoin Platform's ideal characteristics and capabilities towards a well-rounded Reddit Community Points solution!
Our scaling solution for Reddit Community Points involves 2-way peg interoperability with Ethereum. This will provide a scalable token layer built specifically for speed and high volumes of simple value transfers at a very low cost, while providing sovereign ownership and onchain finality.
Token transfers scale by taking advantage of a globally sorting mempool that provides for probabilistically secure assumptions of “as good as settled”. The opportunity here for token receivers is to have an app-layer interactivity on the speed/security tradeoff (99.9999% assurance within 10 seconds). We call this Z-DAG, and it achieves high-throughput across a mesh network topology presently composed of about 2,000 geographically dispersed full-nodes. Similar to Bitcoin, however, these nodes are incentivized to run full-nodes for the benefit of network security, through a bonded validator scheme. These nodes do not participate in the consensus of transactions or block validation any differently than other nodes and therefore do not degrade the security model of Bitcoin’s validate first then trust, across every node. Each token transfer settles on-chain. The protocol follows Bitcoin core policies so it has adequate code coverage and protocol hardening to be qualified as production quality software. It shares a significant portion of Bitcoin’s own hashpower through merged-mining.
This platform as a whole can serve token microtransactions, larger settlements, and store-of-value in an ideal fashion, providing probabilistic scalability whilst remaining decentralized according to Bitcoin design. It is accessible to ERC-20 via a permissionless and trust-minimized bridge that works in both directions. The bridge and token platform are currently available on the Syscoin mainnet. This has been gaining recent attention for use by loyalty point programs and stablecoins such as Binance USD.

Solutions

Syscoin Foundation identified a few paths for Reddit to leverage this infrastructure, each with trade-offs. The first provides the most cost-savings and scaling benefits at some sacrifice of token autonomy. The second offers more preservation of autonomy with a more narrow scope of cost savings than the first option, but savings even so. The third introduces more complexity than the previous two yet provides the most overall benefits. We consider the third as most viable as it enables Reddit to benefit even while retaining existing smart contract functionality. We will focus on the third option, and include the first two for good measure.
  1. Distribution, burns and user-to-user transfers of Reddit Points are entirely carried out on the Syscoin network. This full-on approach to utilizing the Syscoin network provides the most scalability and transaction cost benefits of these scenarios. The tradeoff here is distribution and subscription handling likely migrating away from smart contracts into the application layer.
  2. The Reddit Community Points ecosystem can continue to use existing smart contracts as they are used today on the Ethereum mainchain. Users migrate a portion of their tokens to Syscoin, the scaling network, to gain much lower fees, scalability, and a proven base layer, without sacrificing sovereign ownership. They would use Syscoin for user-to-user transfers. Tips redeemable in ten seconds or less, a high-throughput relay network, and onchain settlement at a block target of 60 seconds.
  3. Integration between Matic Network and Syscoin Platform - similar to Syscoin’s current integration with Ethereum - will provide Reddit Community Points with EVM scalability (including the Memberships ERC777 operator) on the Matic side, and performant simple value transfers, robust decentralized security, and sovereign store-of-value on the Syscoin side. It’s “the best of both worlds”. The trade-off is more complex interoperability.

Syscoin + Matic Integration

Matic and Blockchain Foundry Inc, the public company formed by the founders of Syscoin, recently entered a partnership for joint research and business development initiatives. This is ideal for all parties as Matic Network and Syscoin Platform provide complementary utility. Syscoin offers characteristics for sovereign ownership and security based on Bitcoin’s time-tested model, and shares a significant portion of Bitcoin’s own hashpower. Syscoin’s focus is on secure and scalable simple value transfers, trust-minimized interoperability, and opt-in regulatory compliance for tokenized assets rather than scalability for smart contract execution. On the other hand, Matic Network can provide scalable EVM for smart contract execution. Reddit Community Points can benefit from both.
Syscoin + Matic integration is actively being explored by both teams, as it is helpful to Reddit, Ethereum, and the industry as a whole.

Proving Performance & Cost Savings

Our POC focuses on 100,000 on-chain settlements of token transfers on the Syscoin Core blockchain. Transfers and burns perform equally with Syscoin. For POCs related to smart contracts (subscriptions, etc), refer to the Matic Network proposal.
On-chain settlement of 100k transactions was accomplished within roughly twelve minutes, well-exceeding Reddit’s expectation of five days. This was performed using six full-nodes operating on compute-optimized AWS c4.2xlarge instances which were geographically distributed (Virginia, London, Sao Paulo Brazil, Oregon, Singapore, Germany). A higher quantity of settlements could be reached within the same time-frame with more broadcasting nodes involved, or using hosts with more resources for faster execution of the process.
Addresses used: 100,014
The demonstration was executed using this tool. The results can be seen in the following blocks:
612722: https://sys1.bcfn.ca/block/6d47796d043bb4c508d29123e6ae81b051f5e0aaef849f253c8f3a6942a022ce
612723: https://sys1.bcfn.ca/block/8e2077f743461b90f80b4bef502f564933a8e04de97972901f3d65cfadcf1faf
612724: https://sys1.bcfn.ca/block/205436d25b1b499fce44c29567c5c807beaca915b83cc9f3c35b0d76dbb11f6e
612725: https://sys1.bcfn.ca/block/776d1b1a0f90f655a6bbdf559ff5072459cbdc5682d7615ff4b78c00babdc237
612726: https://sys1.bcfn.ca/block/de4df0994253742a1ac8ac9eec8d2a8c8b0a6d72c53d6f3caa29bb6c171b0a6b
612727: https://sys1.bcfn.ca/block/e5e167c52a9decb313fbaadf49a5e34cb490f8084f642a850385476d4ef10d70
612728: https://sys1.bcfn.ca/block/ab64d989edc71890e7b5b8491c20e9a27520dc45a5f7c776d3dae79057f59fe7
612729: https://sys1.bcfn.ca/block/5e8b7ecd0e36f99d07e4ea6e135fc952bf7ec30164ab6f4d1e98b0f2d405df6d
612730: https://sys1.bcfn.ca/block/d395df3d31dde60bbb0bece6bd5b358297da878f0beb96be389e5f0e043580a3
It is important to note that this POC is not focused on Z-DAG. The performance of Z-DAG has been benchmarked within realistic network conditions: Whiteblock’s audit is publicly available. Network latency tests showed an average TPS around 15k with burst capacity up to 61k. Zero-latency control group exhibited ~150k TPS. Mainnet testing of the Z-DAG network is achievable and will require further coordination and additional resources.
Even further optimizations are expected in the upcoming Syscoin Core release which will implement a UTXO model for our token layer bringing further efficiency as well as open the door to additional scaling technology currently under research by our team and academic partners. At present our token layer is account-based, similar to Ethereum. Opt-in compliance structures will also be introduced soon which will offer some positive performance characteristics as well. It makes the most sense to implement these optimizations before performing another benchmark for Z-DAG, especially on the mainnet considering the resources required to stress-test this network.

Cost Savings

Total cost for these 100k transactions: $0.63 USD
See the live fee comparison for savings estimation between transactions on Ethereum and Syscoin. Below is a snapshot at time of writing:
ETH price: $318.55 ETH gas price: 55.00 Gwei ($0.37)
Syscoin price: $0.11
Snapshot of live fee comparison chart
Z-DAG provides a more efficient fee-market. A typical Z-DAG transaction costs 0.0000582 SYS. Tokens can be safely redeemed/re-spent within seconds or allowed to settle on-chain beforehand. The costs should remain about this low for microtransactions.
Syscoin will achieve further reduction of fees and even greater scalability with offchain payment channels for assets, with Z-DAG as a resilience fallback. New payment channel technology is one of the topics under research by the Syscoin development team with our academic partners at TU Delft. In line with the calculation in the Lightning Networks white paper, payment channels using assets with Syscoin Core will bring theoretical capacity for each person on Earth (7.8 billion) to have five on-chain transactions per year, per person, without requiring anyone to enter a fee market (aka “wait for a block”). This exceeds the minimum LN expectation of two transactions per person, per year; one to exist on-chain and one to settle aggregated value.

Tools, Infrastructure & Documentation

Syscoin Bridge

Mainnet Demonstration of Syscoin Bridge with the Basic Attention Token ERC-20
A two-way blockchain interoperability system that uses Simple Payment Verification to enable:
  • Any Standard ERC-20 token to be moved from Ethereum to the Syscoin blockchain as a Syscoin Platform Token (SPT), and back to Ethereum
  • Any SPT to be moved from Syscoin to the Ethereum blockchain as an ERC-20 token, and back to Syscoin

Benefits

  • Permissionless
  • No counterparties involved
  • No trading mechanisms involved
  • No third-party liquidity providers required
  • Cross-chain Fractional Supply - 2-way peg - Token supply maintained globally
  • ERC-20s gain vastly improved transactionality with the Syscoin Token Platform, along with the security of bitcoin-core-compliant PoW.
  • SPTs gain access to all the tooling, applications and capabilities of Ethereum for ERC-20, including smart contracts.
https://preview.redd.it/l8t2m8ldh8e51.png?width=1180&format=png&auto=webp&s=b0a955a0181746dc79aff718bd0bf607d3c3aa23
https://preview.redd.it/26htnxzfh8e51.png?width=1180&format=png&auto=webp&s=d0383d3c2ee836c9f60b57eca35542e9545f741d

Source code

https://github.com/syscoin/?q=sysethereum
Main Subprojects

API

Tools to simplify using Syscoin Bridge as a service with dapps and wallets will be released some time after implementation of Syscoin Core 4.2. These will be based upon the same processes which are automated in the current live Sysethereum Dapp that is functioning with the Syscoin mainnet.

Documentation

Syscoin Bridge & How it Works (description and process flow)
Superblock Validation Battles
HOWTO: Provision the Bridge for your ERC-20
HOWTO: Setup an Agent
Developer & User Diligence

Trade-off

The Syscoin Ethereum Bridge is secured by Agent nodes participating in a decentralized and incentivized model that involves roles of Superblock challengers and submitters. This model is open to participation. The benefits here are trust-minimization, permissionless-ness, and potentially less legal/regulatory red-tape than interop mechanisms that involve liquidity providers and/or trading mechanisms.
The trade-off is that due to the decentralized nature there are cross-chain settlement times of one hour to cross from Ethereum to Syscoin, and three hours to cross from Syscoin to Ethereum. We are exploring ways to reduce this time while maintaining decentralization via zkp. Even so, an “instant bridge” experience could be provided by means of a third-party liquidity mechanism. That option exists but is not required for bridge functionality today. Typically bridges are used with batch value, not with high frequencies of smaller values, and generally it is advantageous to keep some value on both chains for maximum availability of utility. Even so, the cross-chain settlement time is good to mention here.

Cost

Ethereum -> Syscoin: Matic or Ethereum transaction fee for bridge contract interaction, negligible Syscoin transaction fee for minting tokens
Syscoin -> Ethereum: Negligible Syscoin transaction fee for burning tokens, 0.01% transaction fee paid to Bridge Agent in the form of the ERC-20, Matic or Ethereum transaction fee for contract interaction.

Z-DAG

Zero-Confirmation Directed Acyclic Graph is an instant settlement protocol that is used as a complementary system to proof-of-work (PoW) in the confirmation of Syscoin service transactions. In essence, a Z-DAG is simply a directed acyclic graph (DAG) where validating nodes verify the sequential ordering of transactions that are received in their memory pools. Z-DAG is used by the validating nodes across the network to ensure that there is absolute consensus on the ordering of transactions and no balances are overflowed (no double-spends).

Benefits

  • Unique fee-market that is more efficient for microtransaction redemption and settlement
  • Uses decentralized means to enable tokens with value transfer scalability that is comparable or exceeds that of credit card networks
  • Provides high throughput and secure fulfillment even if blocks are full
  • Probabilistic and interactive
  • 99.9999% security assurance within 10 seconds
  • Can serve payment channels as a resilience fallback that is faster and lower-cost than falling-back directly to a blockchain
  • Each Z-DAG transaction also settles onchain through Syscoin Core at 60-second block target using SHA-256 Proof of Work consensus
https://preview.redd.it/pgbx84jih8e51.png?width=1614&format=png&auto=webp&s=5f631d42a33dc698365eb8dd184b6d442def6640

Source code

https://github.com/syscoin/syscoin

API

Syscoin-js provides tooling for all Syscoin Core RPCs including interactivity with Z-DAG.

Documentation

Z-DAG White Paper
Useful read: An in-depth Z-DAG discussion between Syscoin Core developer Jag Sidhu and Brave Software Research Engineer Gonçalo Pestana

Trade-off

Z-DAG enables the ideal speed/security tradeoff to be determined per use-case in the application layer. It minimizes the sacrifice required to accept and redeem fast transfers/payments while providing more-than-ample security for microtransactions. This is supported on the premise that a Reddit user receiving points does need security yet generally doesn’t want nor need to wait for the same level of security as a nation-state settling an international trade debt. In any case, each Z-DAG transaction settles onchain at a block target of 60 seconds.

Syscoin Specs

Syscoin 3.0 White Paper
(4.0 white paper is pending. For improved scalability and less blockchain bloat, some features of v3 no longer exist in current v4: Specifically Marketplace Offers, Aliases, Escrow, Certificates, Pruning, Encrypted Messaging)
  • 16MB block bandwidth per minute assuming segwit witness carrying transactions, and transactions ~200 bytes on average
  • SHA256 merge mined with Bitcoin
  • UTXO asset layer, with base Syscoin layer sharing identical security policies as Bitcoin Core
  • Z-DAG on asset layer, bridge to Ethereum on asset layer
  • On-chain scaling with prospect of enabling enterprise grade reliable trustless payment processing with on/offchain hybrid solution
  • Focus only on Simple Value Transfers. MVP of blockchain consensus footprint is balances and ownership of them. Everything else can reduce data availability in exchange for scale (Ethereum 2.0 model). We leave that to other designs, we focus on transfers.
  • Future integrations of MAST/Taproot to get more complex value transfers without trading off trustlessness or decentralization.
  • Zero-knowledge Proofs are a cryptographic new frontier. We are dabbling here to generalize the concept of bridging and also verify the state of a chain efficiently. We also apply it in our Digital Identity projects at Blockchain Foundry (a publicly traded company which develops Syscoin softwares for clients). We are also looking to integrate privacy preserving payment channels for off-chain payments through zkSNARK hub & spoke design which does not suffer from the HTLC attack vectors evident on LN. Much of the issues plaguing Lightning Network can be resolved using a zkSNARK design whilst also providing the ability to do a multi-asset payment channel system. Currently we found a showstopper attack (American Call Option) on LN if we were to use multiple-assets. This would not exist in a system such as this.

Wallets

Web3 and mobile wallets are under active development by Blockchain Foundry Inc as WebAssembly applications and expected for release not long after mainnet deployment of Syscoin Core 4.2. Both of these will be multi-coin wallets that support Syscoin, SPTs, Ethereum, and ERC-20 tokens. The Web3 wallet will provide functionality similar to Metamask.
Syscoin Platform and tokens are already integrated with Blockbook. Custom hardware wallet support currently exists via ElectrumSys. First-class HW wallet integration through apps such as Ledger Live will exist after 4.2.
Current supported wallets
Syscoin Spark Desktop
Syscoin-Qt

Explorers

Mainnet: https://sys1.bcfn.ca (Blockbook)
Testnet: https://explorer-testnet.blockchainfoundry.co

Thank you for close consideration of our proposal. We look forward to feedback, and to working with the Reddit community to implement an ideal solution using Syscoin Platform!

submitted by sidhujag to ethereum [link] [comments]

coinlib analysis

https://coinlib.io/coin/BTC/Bitcoin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/ETH/Ethereum#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/XRP/XRP#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/BNB/Binance+Coin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/USDT/Tether#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/LINK/ChainLink#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/BCH/Bitcoin+Cash#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/LTC/Litecoin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/BSV/Bitcoin+SV#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/EOS/EOS#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/ADA/Cardano#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/CRO/Crypto.com+Chain#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/TRX/TRON#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/XTZ/Tezos#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/XMMonero#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/XLM/Stellar#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/NEO/NEO#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/LEO3/UNUS+SED+LEO#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/HT/Huobi+Token#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/XEM/NEM#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/ATOM/Cosmos#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/SNX/Synthetix#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/IOT/IOTA#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/LEND/EthLend#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/DASH/Dash#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/VET/VeChain#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/ZEC/ZCash#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/ETC/Ethereum+Classic#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/ONT/Ontology#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/OMG/OmiseGo#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/MKMaker#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/USDC/USCoin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/THETA/Theta+Token#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/HYN/Hyperion#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/OKB/OKB+Token#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/BAT/Basic+Attention+Token#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/DOGE/Dogecoin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/FXC/Flexacoin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/ZRX/0x#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/QTUM/QTUM#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/WAVES/Waves#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/DGB/DigiByte#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/ICX/ICON#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/EDC/EDCBlockchain#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/LRC/Loopring#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/ALGO/Algorand#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/KNC/KyberNetwork+Crystal#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/REN/Republic+Protocol#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/REP/Augur#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/PAX/Paxos+Standard+Token#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/LSK/Lisk#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/ANT/Aragon#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/ZIL/Zilliqa#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/ZB/ZB+Token#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/DCDecred#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/BTG/Bitcoin+Gold#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/DGD/Digix+DAO#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/SC/Siacoin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/TUSD/TrueUSD#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/ENJ/Enjin+Coin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/ERD/Elrond#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/DAI/Dai#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/NANO/Nano#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/BCD/Bitcoin+Diamond#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/GNT/Golem+Network+Token#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/DX/DxChain+Token#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/ABBC/ABBC#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/SNT/Status+Network+Token#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/ATOM/Atomic+Coin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/QNT/Quant#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/RVN/Ravencoin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/LUNA/Luna#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/BTM/Bytom#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/RLC/iEx.ec#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/HOT/HoloToken#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/MONA/MonaCoin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/MANA/Decentraland#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/IOST/IOStoken#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/BTS/Bitshares#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/UTK/Utrust#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/XVG/Verge#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/BNT/Bancor+Network+Token#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/MCO/Monaco#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/NEXO/Nexo#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/ELF/aelf#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/STORJ/Storj#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/STEEM/Steem#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/KMD/Komodo#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/RSReserve+Rights#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/ARDArdor#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/GNO/Gnosis#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/ENG/Enigma#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/HSHshare#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/MATIC/Matic+Network#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/FTM/Fantom+Token#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/ETN/Electroneum#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/STRAT/Stratis#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/GUSD/Gemini+Dollar#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/WIC/WaykiChain#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/VSYS/V+Systems#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/XIN/Mixin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/CVCC/CryptoVerificationCoin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/CENNZ/Centrality#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/TOMO/TomoCoin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/HDAC/Hyundai+DAC#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/ARK/ARK#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/GXC/Gx+Coin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/MAID/MaidSafe+Coin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/AE/Aeternity#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/AION/Aion#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/ZEN/Horizen#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/SYS/Syscoin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/GXS/GXShares#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/WAN/Wanchain#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/REV/Revain#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/THEX/THEX#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/POWPower+Ledger#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/SOLVE/SOLVE#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/TFUEL/Theta+Fuel#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/MLN/Melon#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/NPXS/Pundi+X#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/AGI/SingularityNET#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/UBT/Unibright#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/ELA/Elastos#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/DGTX/Digitex+Futures#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/DATA/Streamr+DATAcoin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/QSP/Quantstamp#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/XZC/ZCoin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/RDD/ReddCoin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/RCN/Ripio#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/ORBS/Orbis#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/BCN/ByteCoin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/BLZ/Bluzelle#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/VEST/Vestchain#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/PIVX/PIVX+Coin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/NULS/NULS#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/LOOM/Loom+Network#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/XDCE/XinFin+Coin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/CRPT/Crypterium#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/FUN/FunFair#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/WTC/Waltonchain#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/NAS/Nebulas+Token#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/REQ/Request+Network#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/AST/AirSwap#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/LAMB/Lambda#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/GAS/Gas#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/DAG/Constellation#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/XSN/Stakenet#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/GNX/Genaro+Network#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/CTXC/Cortex#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/IGNIS/Ignis#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/DENT/Dent#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/IOTX/IoTeX#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/CELCeler+Network#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/XHV/Haven+Protocol#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/ETP/Metaverse#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/CND/Cindicator#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/FSN/Fusion#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/PPT/Populous#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/FOForce+Network#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/QASH/QASH#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/NIM/Nimiq#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/GRS/Groestlcoin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/ABT/Arcblock#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/KBC/KaratGold+Coin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/FCT/Factom#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/DRGN/Dragonchain#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/NXS/Nexus#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/LA/LAToken#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/RDN/Raiden+Network#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/ZAP/Zap#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/VTC/VertCoin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/APL/Apollo+Currency#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/STORM/Storm#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/ADX/AdEx#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/MTL/Metal#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/CVC/Civic#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/SBD/Steem+Backed+Dollars#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/UBQ/Ubiq#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/CS/Credits#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/VGX/Voyager+Token#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/WINGS/Wings+DAO#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/ZEON/ZEON+Network#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/MFT/Mainframe#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/GRIN/Grin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/WGWagerr#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/BRD/Bread+token#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/KEY/SelfKey#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/ACT/Achain#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/IQ/Everipedia#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/PAY/TenX#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/VITE/VITE#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/TEL/Telcoin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/NAV/NavCoin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/BIX/Bibox+Token#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/WABI/WaBi#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/DMT/DMarket#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/TTC3/TTC#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/KIN/Kin+Coin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/MET2/Metronome#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/BURST/Burst#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/NEBL/Neblio#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/ITC/IoT+Chain#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/INT/Internet+Node+Token#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/PPC/PeerCoin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/NEW/Newton#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/GVT/Genesis+Vision#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/TCT/TokenClub#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/PRO/Propy#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/ODE/Odem#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/DNT/district0x#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/DERO/DERO#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/AMO/Amo+Coin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/GTO/Gifto#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/AEON/AeonCoin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/UPP/Sentinel+Protocol#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/EVX/Everex#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/SKY/Skycoin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/XDN/DigitalNote#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/LET/LinkEye#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/B2B/B2BX#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/SRN/SirinLabs#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/TNB/Time+New+Bank#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/ONG/onG.social#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/MDA/Moeda#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/TPAY/TokenPay#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/POA/POA+Network#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/SMT/SmartMesh#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/RUFF/Ruff#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/SALT/Salt+Lending#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/GARD/Hashgard#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/HC/Harvest+Masternode+Coin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/LBC/LBRY+Credits#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/SERO/Super+Zero#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/FNB/FNB+Protocol#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/CDT/CoinDash#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/NIX/NIX+Platform#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/SOUL/Phantasma#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/BLOCK/Blocknet#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/QKC/QuarkChain#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/BZ/Bit-Z+Token#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/POE/Po.et#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/PART/Particl#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/SWFTC/SwftCoin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/BZNT/Bezant#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/QLC/QLC+Chain#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/SNM/SONM#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/SNGLS/SingularDTV#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/VIA/ViaCoin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/NKN/NKN#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/MDS/MediShares#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/XAS/Asch#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/EGT/Egretia#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/PMA/PumaPay#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/NPXSXEM/Pundi+X+NEM#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/ATP/Atlas+Protocol#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/VIBE/VIBE+(VIBEHub)#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/ILC/ILCoin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/SMART/SmartCash#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/ABYSS/Abyss#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/TNT/Tierion#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/CNN/Content+Neutrality+Network#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/APPC/AppCoins#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/WPWePower#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/DLT/Agrello+Delta#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/SEELE/Seele#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/BWX/Blue+Whale+Token#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/NCASH/Nucleus+Vision#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/NOAH/Noahcoin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/NLG/Gulden#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/JNT/Jibrel+Network+Token#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/MITH/Mithril#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/AMB/Ambrosus#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/TCH/Tiger+Cash#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/PAI/PChain#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/YOYOW/Yoyow#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/INXT/Internxt#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/VIB/Viberate#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/SNC/SunContract#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/ZEL/Zel#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/NOS/NOS+Coin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/ABL/Airbloc#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/CPX/APEX#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/DTA/Data#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/YEE/Yee#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/EDR2/Endor+Protocol+Token#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/BEAM/Beam#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/QUN/QunQun#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/SKM/Skrumble+Network#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/SEAL/Seal+Network#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/CARD/Cardstack#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/XAUXaurum#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/ACC/AdCoin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/LINA/Lina#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/MOBI/Mobius#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/OAX/OAX#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/VDG/VeriDocGlobal#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/IONC/IONChain#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/BLK/BlackCoin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/UGAS/UGAS#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/OST/SimpleToken#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/CZCanonChain#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/BCPT/BlockMason+Credit+Protocol#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/DCN/Dentacoin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/MVP/Merculet#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/OLT/OneLedger#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/LCC/LitecoinCash#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/EXRN/EXRNchain#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/MTH/Monetha#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/OCN/Odyssey#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/LYM/Lympo#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/DDD/Scry.info#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/PST/Primas#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/UBEX/Ubex#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/TOL/Tolar#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/SS/Sharder#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/EDN/Eden+Coin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/CURE/Curecoin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/DAX/DAEX#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/RNT/OneRoot+Network#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/VIN/VinChain#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/BOX/ContentBox#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/REM/REMME#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/CHAT/ChatCoin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/ROX/Robotina#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/ZUM/ZumCoin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/TBX/Tokenbox#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/EOSDAC/eosDAC#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/USC/Ultimate+Secure+Cash#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/DAT/Datum#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/VEX/Vexanium#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/SLT/Smartlands#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/ZCO/Zebi+Coin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/PPY/Peerplays#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/PAYX/Paypex#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/HYDRO/Hydro#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/DBC/DeepBrain+Chain#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/SUB/Substratum+Network#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/QCH/QChi#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/BTM/BitMark#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/BTO/Bottos#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/HMQ/Humaniq#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/ACAT/Alphacat#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/CPC/CPChain#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/ISIKC/Isiklar+Coin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/CHX/Chainium#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/NSD/Nasdacoin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/SHIFT/Shift#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/RFRefereum#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/EKO/EchoLink#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/ROCK/RocketCoin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/CLOAK/CloakCoin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/AXE/Axe#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/EXP/Expanse#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/MEMercury#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/IHT/IHT+Real+Estate+Protocol#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/TUBE/BitTube#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/SPHTX/SophiaTX#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/SSC/SelfSell#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/IMT/MoneyToken#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/SCV/Super+CoinView+Token#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/EQUAD/QuadrantProtocol#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/TOTO/Tourist+Token#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/AAC/Acute+Angle+Cloud#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/COSM/Cosmo+Coin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/LOBS/LOBSTEX+Coin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/YEED/YEED#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/PIPL/PiplCoin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/MAS/MidasProtocol#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/SIB/Sibcoin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/LUN/Lunyr#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/XSG/SnowGem#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/SPHSphere+Coin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/MEME/Pepe+Memetic#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/AIT/AICHAIN#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/ZXC/0xcert#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/0XBTC/0xBitcoin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/BIBirake#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/TRTL/TurtleCoin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/QBT/Qbao#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/BEET/BeetleCoin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/FUEL/Etherparty#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/NOTE/DNotes#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/FDZ/Friendz#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/RATING/DPRating#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/CVCOIN/Crypviser#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/RTE/Rate3#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/ABX/Arbidex+Token#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/HBZ/HBZ+Coin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/GEO/GeoCoin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/ARN/Aeron#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/HGT/Hello+Gold#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/UT/Ulord#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/PCL/Peculium#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/METM/MetaMorph+Pro#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/DUO/ParallelCoin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/HQX/HOQU#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/MEXC/MEXC+Token#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/ZLA/Zilla#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/TGAME/Truegame#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/BBO/Bigbom#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/STQ/Storiqa+Token#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/ERC20/ERC20#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/DAC/DACash#performance
submitted by Quippykisset to peaceCorpsCoding [link] [comments]

coinlibanalysis1

https://coinlib.io/coin/BTC/Bitcoin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ETH/Ethereum#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/XRP/XRP#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/BNB/Binance+Coin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/USDT/Tether#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/LINK/ChainLink#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/BCH/Bitcoin+Cash#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/LTC/Litecoin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/BSV/Bitcoin+SV#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/EOS/EOS#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ADA/Cardano#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/CRO/Crypto.com+Chain#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/TRX/TRON#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/XTZ/Tezos#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/XMMonero#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/XLM/Stellar#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/NEO/NEO#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/LEO3/UNUS+SED+LEO#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/HT/Huobi+Token#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/XEM/NEM#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ATOM/Cosmos#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/SNX/Synthetix#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/IOT/IOTA#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/LEND/EthLend#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/DASH/Dash#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/VET/VeChain#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ZEC/ZCash#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ETC/Ethereum+Classic#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ONT/Ontology#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/OMG/OmiseGo#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/MKMaker#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/USDC/USCoin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/THETA/Theta+Token#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/HYN/Hyperion#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/OKB/OKB+Token#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/BAT/Basic+Attention+Token#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/DOGE/Dogecoin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/FXC/Flexacoin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ZRX/0x#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/QTUM/QTUM#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/WAVES/Waves#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/DGB/DigiByte#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ICX/ICON#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/EDC/EDCBlockchain#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/LRC/Loopring#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ALGO/Algorand#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/KNC/KyberNetwork+Crystal#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/REN/Republic+Protocol#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/REP/Augur#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/PAX/Paxos+Standard+Token#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/LSK/Lisk#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ANT/Aragon#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ZIL/Zilliqa#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ZB/ZB+Token#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/DCDecred#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/BTG/Bitcoin+Gold#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/DGD/Digix+DAO#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/SC/Siacoin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/TUSD/TrueUSD#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ENJ/Enjin+Coin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ERD/Elrond#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/DAI/Dai#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/NANO/Nano#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/BCD/Bitcoin+Diamond#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/GNT/Golem+Network+Token#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/DX/DxChain+Token#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ABBC/ABBC#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/SNT/Status+Network+Token#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ATOM/Atomic+Coin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/QNT/Quant#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/RVN/Ravencoin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/LUNA/Luna#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/BTM/Bytom#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/RLC/iEx.ec#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/HOT/HoloToken#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/MONA/MonaCoin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/MANA/Decentraland#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/IOST/IOStoken#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/BTS/Bitshares#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/UTK/Utrust#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/XVG/Verge#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/BNT/Bancor+Network+Token#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/MCO/Monaco#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/NEXO/Nexo#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ELF/aelf#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/STORJ/Storj#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/STEEM/Steem#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/KMD/Komodo#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/RSReserve+Rights#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ARDArdor#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/GNO/Gnosis#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ENG/Enigma#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/HSHshare#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/MATIC/Matic+Network#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/FTM/Fantom+Token#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ETN/Electroneum#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/STRAT/Stratis#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/GUSD/Gemini+Dollar#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/WIC/WaykiChain#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/VSYS/V+Systems#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/XIN/Mixin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/CVCC/CryptoVerificationCoin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/CENNZ/Centrality#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/TOMO/TomoCoin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/HDAC/Hyundai+DAC#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ARK/ARK#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/GXC/Gx+Coin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/MAID/MaidSafe+Coin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/AE/Aeternity#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/AION/Aion#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ZEN/Horizen#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/SYS/Syscoin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/GXS/GXShares#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/WAN/Wanchain#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/REV/Revain#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/THEX/THEX#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/POWPower+Ledger#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/SOLVE/SOLVE#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/TFUEL/Theta+Fuel#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/MLN/Melon#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/NPXS/Pundi+X#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/AGI/SingularityNET#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/UBT/Unibright#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ELA/Elastos#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/DGTX/Digitex+Futures#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/DATA/Streamr+DATAcoin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/QSP/Quantstamp#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/XZC/ZCoin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/RDD/ReddCoin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/RCN/Ripio#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ORBS/Orbis#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/BCN/ByteCoin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/BLZ/Bluzelle#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/VEST/Vestchain#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/PIVX/PIVX+Coin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/NULS/NULS#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/LOOM/Loom+Network#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/XDCE/XinFin+Coin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/CRPT/Crypterium#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/FUN/FunFair#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/WTC/Waltonchain#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/NAS/Nebulas+Token#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/REQ/Request+Network#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/AST/AirSwap#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/LAMB/Lambda#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/GAS/Gas#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/DAG/Constellation#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/XSN/Stakenet#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/GNX/Genaro+Network#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/CTXC/Cortex#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/IGNIS/Ignis#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/DENT/Dent#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/IOTX/IoTeX#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/CELCeler+Network#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/XHV/Haven+Protocol#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ETP/Metaverse#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/CND/Cindicator#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/FSN/Fusion#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/PPT/Populous#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/FOForce+Network#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/QASH/QASH#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/NIM/Nimiq#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/GRS/Groestlcoin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ABT/Arcblock#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/KBC/KaratGold+Coin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/FCT/Factom#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/DRGN/Dragonchain#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/NXS/Nexus#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/LA/LAToken#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/RDN/Raiden+Network#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ZAP/Zap#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/VTC/VertCoin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/APL/Apollo+Currency#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/STORM/Storm#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ADX/AdEx#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/MTL/Metal#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/CVC/Civic#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/SBD/Steem+Backed+Dollars#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/UBQ/Ubiq#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/CS/Credits#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/VGX/Voyager+Token#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/WINGS/Wings+DAO#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ZEON/ZEON+Network#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/MFT/Mainframe#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/GRIN/Grin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/WGWagerr#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/BRD/Bread+token#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/KEY/SelfKey#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ACT/Achain#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/IQ/Everipedia#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/PAY/TenX#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/VITE/VITE#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/TEL/Telcoin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/NAV/NavCoin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/BIX/Bibox+Token#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/WABI/WaBi#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/DMT/DMarket#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/TTC3/TTC#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/KIN/Kin+Coin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/MET2/Metronome#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/BURST/Burst#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/NEBL/Neblio#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ITC/IoT+Chain#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/INT/Internet+Node+Token#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/PPC/PeerCoin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/NEW/Newton#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/GVT/Genesis+Vision#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/TCT/TokenClub#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/PRO/Propy#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ODE/Odem#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/DNT/district0x#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/DERO/DERO#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/AMO/Amo+Coin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/GTO/Gifto#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/AEON/AeonCoin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/UPP/Sentinel+Protocol#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/EVX/Everex#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/SKY/Skycoin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/XDN/DigitalNote#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/LET/LinkEye#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/B2B/B2BX#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/SRN/SirinLabs#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/TNB/Time+New+Bank#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ONG/onG.social#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/MDA/Moeda#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/TPAY/TokenPay#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/POA/POA+Network#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/SMT/SmartMesh#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/RUFF/Ruff#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/SALT/Salt+Lending#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/GARD/Hashgard#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/HC/Harvest+Masternode+Coin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/LBC/LBRY+Credits#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/SERO/Super+Zero#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/FNB/FNB+Protocol#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/CDT/CoinDash#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/NIX/NIX+Platform#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/SOUL/Phantasma#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/BLOCK/Blocknet#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/QKC/QuarkChain#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/BZ/Bit-Z+Token#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/POE/Po.et#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/PART/Particl#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/SWFTC/SwftCoin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/BZNT/Bezant#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/QLC/QLC+Chain#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/SNM/SONM#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/SNGLS/SingularDTV#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/VIA/ViaCoin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/NKN/NKN#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/MDS/MediShares#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/XAS/Asch#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/EGT/Egretia#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/PMA/PumaPay#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/NPXSXEM/Pundi+X+NEM#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ATP/Atlas+Protocol#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/VIBE/VIBE+(VIBEHub)#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ILC/ILCoin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/SMART/SmartCash#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ABYSS/Abyss#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/TNT/Tierion#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/CNN/Content+Neutrality+Network#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/APPC/AppCoins#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/WPWePower#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/DLT/Agrello+Delta#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/SEELE/Seele#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/BWX/Blue+Whale+Token#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/NCASH/Nucleus+Vision#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/NOAH/Noahcoin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/NLG/Gulden#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/JNT/Jibrel+Network+Token#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/MITH/Mithril#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/AMB/Ambrosus#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/TCH/Tiger+Cash#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/PAI/PChain#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/YOYOW/Yoyow#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/INXT/Internxt#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/VIB/Viberate#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/SNC/SunContract#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ZEL/Zel#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/NOS/NOS+Coin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ABL/Airbloc#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/CPX/APEX#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/DTA/Data#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/YEE/Yee#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/EDR2/Endor+Protocol+Token#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/BEAM/Beam#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/QUN/QunQun#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/SKM/Skrumble+Network#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/SEAL/Seal+Network#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/CARD/Cardstack#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/XAUXaurum#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ACC/AdCoin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/LINA/Lina#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/MOBI/Mobius#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/OAX/OAX#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/VDG/VeriDocGlobal#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/IONC/IONChain#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/BLK/BlackCoin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/UGAS/UGAS#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/OST/SimpleToken#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/CZCanonChain#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/BCPT/BlockMason+Credit+Protocol#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/DCN/Dentacoin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/MVP/Merculet#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/OLT/OneLedger#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/LCC/LitecoinCash#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/EXRN/EXRNchain#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/MTH/Monetha#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/OCN/Odyssey#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/LYM/Lympo#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/DDD/Scry.info#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/PST/Primas#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/UBEX/Ubex#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/TOL/Tolar#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/SS/Sharder#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/EDN/Eden+Coin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/CURE/Curecoin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/DAX/DAEX#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/RNT/OneRoot+Network#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/VIN/VinChain#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/BOX/ContentBox#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/REM/REMME#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/CHAT/ChatCoin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ROX/Robotina#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ZUM/ZumCoin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/TBX/Tokenbox#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/EOSDAC/eosDAC#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/USC/Ultimate+Secure+Cash#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/DAT/Datum#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/VEX/Vexanium#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/SLT/Smartlands#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ZCO/Zebi+Coin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/PPY/Peerplays#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/PAYX/Paypex#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/HYDRO/Hydro#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/DBC/DeepBrain+Chain#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/SUB/Substratum+Network#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/QCH/QChi#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/BTM/BitMark#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/BTO/Bottos#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/HMQ/Humaniq#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ACAT/Alphacat#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/CPC/CPChain#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ISIKC/Isiklar+Coin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/CHX/Chainium#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/NSD/Nasdacoin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/SHIFT/Shift#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/RFRefereum#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/EKO/EchoLink#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ROCK/RocketCoin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/CLOAK/CloakCoin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/AXE/Axe#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/EXP/Expanse#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/MEMercury#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/IHT/IHT+Real+Estate+Protocol#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/TUBE/BitTube#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/SPHTX/SophiaTX#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/SSC/SelfSell#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/IMT/MoneyToken#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/SCV/Super+CoinView+Token#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/EQUAD/QuadrantProtocol#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/TOTO/Tourist+Token#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/AAC/Acute+Angle+Cloud#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/COSM/Cosmo+Coin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/LOBS/LOBSTEX+Coin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/YEED/YEED#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/PIPL/PiplCoin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/MAS/MidasProtocol#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/SIB/Sibcoin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/LUN/Lunyr#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/XSG/SnowGem#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/SPHSphere+Coin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/MEME/Pepe+Memetic#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/AIT/AICHAIN#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ZXC/0xcert#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/0XBTC/0xBitcoin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/BIBirake#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/TRTL/TurtleCoin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/QBT/Qbao#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/BEET/BeetleCoin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/FUEL/Etherparty#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/NOTE/DNotes#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/FDZ/Friendz#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/RATING/DPRating#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/CVCOIN/Crypviser#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/RTE/Rate3#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ABX/Arbidex+Token#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/HBZ/HBZ+Coin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/GEO/GeoCoin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ARN/Aeron#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/HGT/Hello+Gold#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/UT/Ulord#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/PCL/Peculium#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/METM/MetaMorph+Pro#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/DUO/ParallelCoin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/HQX/HOQU#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/MEXC/MEXC+Token#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ZLA/Zilla#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/TGAME/Truegame#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/BBO/Bigbom#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/STQ/Storiqa+Token#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ERC20/ERC20#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/DAC/DACash#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/FOXT/Fox+Trading#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ADI/Aditus#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/JET/Jetcoin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/PTT/Proton+Token#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/EVN/EvenCoin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/TDP/TrueDeck#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/OCEAN/BurstOcean#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ELY/Elysian#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ETHO/Ether-1#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/DML/Decentralized+Machine+Learning#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/BETHEBethereum#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/KLKS/Kalkulus#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/TNS/Transcodium#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/MORE/More+Coin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/APAPR+Coin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ATB/ATB+coin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/XUEZ/Xuez#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/WEB/Webcoin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/SINS/SafeInsure#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/BTT/Blocktrade#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/CEN/Coinsuper+Ecosystem+Network#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/IG/IGToken#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/STREAM/STREAMIT+COIN#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/META/Metacash#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/CMT/CometCoin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/MNX/MinexCoin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/BPT/Blockport#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/BIP/BipCoin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/BOLD/Boldman+Capital#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/XOV/XOVBank#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ARC/Arcade+Token#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/VIKKY/VikkyToken#analysis
submitted by Quippykisset to peaceCorpsCoding [link] [comments]

Bitcoin Halving Bull Run? Binance Launches Bitcoin Mining Pool - BitPay BUSD - Kim Jong Un BTC Stash I’ve Changed My Mind on Binance!! BNB #1 Altcoin!? DigiByte Is ON BINANCE!!! Transfer Crypto Assets From Binance to Ledger - YouTube Binance is Enemy #1 of the ETHEREUM DeFi Kindgom!! BINANCE - COMO COMPRAR E VENDER BITCOINS  RODRIGO MIRANDA ... Dicas para comprar, receber e vender bitcoin com reais na Binance Bitcoins storten op binance DigiByte - Binance - Coinbase - Gemini - Kraken How I Made +40% PROFIT Trading Bitcoin In 1 DAY ...

Excessive Bitcoin Charges? Binance Simply Moved $550 Million for $5 Bucks - Bitcoin and Ethereum news, analysis and review about technology, finance, blockchain and markets - cryptocurrency news. As per the latest data from Coin.Dance, 73.6% of BCH blocks have signaled support for BCHN over the last 7 days, compared to 0.8% for BCHA. If this signaling status continues through the hard fork, Binance will treat the BCHN chain as the future BCH chain Sie haben aktuell die Ausgangswährung Binance Coin und die Zielwährung Bytecoin mit einem Betrag von 1 Binance Coin gewählt. Im Devisenrechner von boerse-online.de können Sie die Wechselkurse ... Binance users can now buy Bitcoin with practically all of the fiat currencies in existence; Binance, which is one of the leading cryptocurrency exchanges in the world, has partnered with the peer-to-peer crypto exchange Paxful. Via this partnership, Binance users can now use 167 different fiat currencies to buy Bitcoin. On Tuesday (9 October 2018), Binance, the world’s largest crypto exchange (by trading volume), announced that it plans to delist Bytecoin (BCN), ChatCoin (CHAT), Iconomi (ICN), and Triggers (TRIG). Of these four cryptocurrencies, Bytecoin is the most important. Naturally, this news has hurt the price. At press time, Bytecoin is trading at 0.001856, down 15.82% in the past 24-hour period. “1/8 It’s time to set the binance record straight and let the world know the truth. The binance – DGB story starts with us refusing to pay the “listing fee” last summer/fall. And continuing to refuse to ever pay it for the last 12 months.” Additionally, CZ commented on the latest listing. He tweeted, You asked for it, we listened. Had to filter through "some noise" on this one, lol ... 1/8 It’s time to set the binance record straight and let the world know the truth. The binance – DGB story starts with us refusing to pay the “listing fee” last summer/fall. And continuing to refuse to ever pay it for the last 12 months. — Jared Tate (@jaredctate) October 8, 2018. A Curious Incident

[index] [23261] [6528] [19598] [12924] [22136] [10634] [12520] [23696] [16459] [7608]

Bitcoin Halving Bull Run? Binance Launches Bitcoin Mining Pool - BitPay BUSD - Kim Jong Un BTC Stash

09:25 Binance & the Tether Cartel 11:54 Binance is Not Reducing Tether USDT Holdings 13:02 You Can't BS A BS'r: Binance Will Fail 13:48 Stop Using Binance! 14:12 Outro 📺Watch These Videos Again📺 Como comprar Bitcoins na Binance com Reais - Parte I - Duration: 10:35. Escola de Investimentos Digitais 152 views. 10:35. Binance Pool’s first product offering will be Bitcoin mining, using a FPPS payment method. - BitPay Partners With Binance to Support BUSD Payments Around the World BITCOIN Price Analysis- DIGIBYTE Explodes as its Listed on Binance! - Duration: 8:33. Arcane Bear 1,377 views. 8:33. Dragonchain: The World Will Soon Know About It - Duration: 11:01. Crazy 4 ... Today, we take a closer look at how you can move your crypto assets from your Binance account to your Ledger Live account. Read more about it in this article... hierbij een snelle en korte uitleg over hoe je bitcoins op je binance stort vanaf bijvoorbeeld je jaxx wallet :) Kom trouwens ook gezellig in onze app:) http... Segue o link de Cadastro da Binance: https://goo.gl/wUwzvw Para saber mais sobre meu Curso Bitcoin Trader acesse: https://bit.ly/2Utd4Af [ATENÇÃO] Não deixe ... Kraken Exchange Tutorial 2020 - Buy & Sell Bitcoin, Ethereum, XRP & other Cryptocurrencies - Duration: 12:21. Kierin Mulholland - Ethereum DeFi & Crypto Videos 7,968 views 12:21 Join Binance Here: https://www.binance.com/en/futures/ref/41297141 👉-10% Discount Code For Binance Futures Referral is → 41297141 👉GET My Technical Analysi... Binance is no friend of Ethereum but Enemy #1! They are planning a massive attack against Ethereum DeFi!! They have attacked the base chain with Tether, they are attacking Ether traders with ...

http://binaryoptiontrade-arabic-trade-brocker.binaryoptionstradingusa.online